David once again defeats Goliath! Community members of Chinatown, Lower East Side, SoHo and other downtown areas gathered last Tuesday 9/24 with Council Member Christopher Marte to celebrate our victory against a developer’s latest attempt to build luxury high rises on the Two Bridges waterfront. 

A month ago, Chetrit, the developer and owner of 265-275 Cherry Street, announced that they were in the final stages of bringing on a development partner to help finance their megatowers project, and planned to break ground within a few weeks. Our community, with Council Member Marte’s leadership, swiftly condemned Chetrit’s greed in pushing this project and their disregard for people’s lives. Three weeks later, the tide has quickly turned in the community’s favor: Chetrit, abandoned by their development partner, is backing out of the project and has defaulted on their loan. The lot now heads to the auction block.

Chetrit’s surrender is the latest victory in our community’s years-long fight against the megatowers. By organizing with Two Bridges residents, neighbors from the Lower East Side and Chinatown, as well as workers, students and small businesses who are a part of these communities, we have proven that a unified community can triumph over the greed of billionaire developers.

These two towers, each 60- to 80-story tall, were planned to be built right next to two existing buildings that provide affordable housing. If built, they would damage the structure of the buildings, threaten the health and safety of their residents and drive up real estate taxes and rents in the surrounding area. In 2017, with the support of former Council Member Margaret Chin, developers proposed to build these luxury megatowers. Chin sent a letter to residents saying they “could not stop the towers from going up” and at best they could ask for some crumbs from the developers. Since then, multiple developers have taken over the project only to abandon it, due to consistent community organizing against displacement. 

Mr. Chen, a longtime Two Bridges resident, said: “These developers don’t care about the people, they only care about money. But because our community is very united, and because we have a very good City Council Member, Chris Marte, who stands with the tenants and stands with the community, we are able to fight back!”

Council Member Chris Marte said: “Today is a testament to the will of the people. It’s a major win for our neighborhood, for our city. When people on the street say this is just the way it is, there’s nothing we can do, you’re going to say: however, in Two Bridges, we took on developers & won!”

In celebrating this victory, community members call on the City to pass the Chinatown Working Group Rezoning Plan, which would stop luxury high-rises and limit real estate speculation in Chinatown and the Lower East Side by capping the height of new developments and mandating truly affordable housing. 

Our community sends a clear message to any big developers threatening to take over our neighborhoods: do not build luxury towers that destroy people’s lives, or else you will encounter our united opposition and lose.

It is wrong for the City or State government to turn hotels into shelters or build shelters to solve the problem of homelessness. Not only is it unfair to low-income communities of color, but it is also not good for homeless people and families, and does not solve their housing and livelihood issues at all. We want the government to stop wasting taxpayers’ money fattening up the rich and real estate developers who run hotels and shelters. We demand the State and City governments use public funds to build low-income housing for working people, who are increasingly unable to afford rising rents, instead of paying big developers to build only luxury high-rises and hotels on one hand, and homeless shelters on the other.

For example, the vacant land next to Confucius Plaza and NYCHA can be used to build low-income housing. Yet after the 1960s, the Federal government has hardly built any public housing. Doesn’t the government know that the population is growing and the gap between the rich and the poor is widening? Or does it only know to let real estate developers build high-rises to make more money?

We have reservations about the anti-shelter movement on 86th Street in Brooklyn, which criminalizes homeless people. Opposing homeless shelters but only caring about themselves and not homeless people, they are pitted against other communities by the City government and big developers. This only benefits big developers. Their criminalization of homeless people is similar to Trump’s criminalization of immigrants. It makes sense that the Democratic Party tends to support homeless shelters and the Republican Party tends to oppose shelters! Support or opposition falls into the trap of the ruling class (in New York City, this is basically the real estate and financial capital class). Trump and the Republican Party claim to only target undocumented immigrants, but in fact, they are criminalizing all immigrants! The Democratic Party claims to care about undocumented immigrants, but in fact it is doing everything possible to keep immigrants as an underclass of labor. Immigrants  are pitted against the so-called native workers. Whether it is the Republican or Democratic Party, the main line of their policies is to divide the working class, deepen racial tension and deepen exploitation.

The current anti-shelter movement on 86th St is not  really against shelters, but only against shelters near their homes. This movement can easily be used by those with ulterior motives or misunderstood as anti-Black or anti-homeless people and families. We shouldn’t let the Chinese  community be isolated, which will bring only harm to us Chinese. In case you have doubts about this, Mayor Adams has already said that the anti-shelter movement on 86th St is against single Black men. And the Sing Tao Daily, which has always encouraged big developers and home care agencies to abuse our community , has promoted the 86th Street movement every day. This makes even more clear that this movement does not help our community

We must break the isolation of the Chinese community, care about the conditions of the residents in the shelter, and unite across race to demand the government build low-income housing and stop helping big developers from displacing our communities.

Chinese Staff and Workers’ Association
212-334-2333

The New York State Government’s legislation against hate crimes was included in this year’s state budget. This bill will include more illegal behaviors to be defined as “hate crimes”. This is good news. However, some racist institutions hold the banner of “anti-racism” to cover up and continue their racism and violence. For example, recently, the Chinese-American Planning Council (CPC) is holding a “Stop Asian Hate” film screening and discussion at the Museum of Chinese in America (MOCA) on May 4.

The so-called “non-profit organization” CPC has taken the lead in forcing home care workers into 24-hour workdays and stealing over $100 million wages from them. It recently moved its headquarters to a new 30-story luxury high-rise in the Lower East Side. The 24-hour workdays are inhumane. Most of the home attendants are Chinese and other women of color. They are forced to work 24 hours a day for a long time, which causes serious damage to their physical and mental health and family relationships. While CPC is committing this kind of violence against women of color, it’s asking the government for funding to fight anti-Asian violence! As the saying goes, birds of a feather flock together. MOCA sells out the community by taking the City’s $35 million to support its construction of a new jail in Chinatown. It has long been notorious and boycotted by the community for many years. How dare these institutions carry out activities in the name of “Stop Asian Hate”! Aren’t they the ones who should stop their own hatred against Asians?

CPC’s event also attracted some elected officials to participate. We call on these elected officials to keep their eyes open and stand with the community against racism by boycotting these blood-sucking institutions.

Vincent Cao
Chinese Staff and Workers’ Association

Home care workers and supporters went on a hunger strike for six days, demanding that City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams pass a bill to abolish the 24-hour workday. It drew huge attention in the society and raised everyone’s awareness from just caring about making money to caring about their own health and relationships with their families: Working long hours causes loss of health and family, and no amount of money can buy them back!

The May Day protest is approaching. In addition to demanding the abolition of the 24-hour workday, we should also further raise other demands to unite the working class. Nowadays, not only do home attendants become injured due to long hours of work, but the health of workers across industries and even young people is also affected by the deterioration of the working and living environment. However, the privatization of medical insurance in the United States allows insurance companies to make profits, resulting in most people having to buy expensive insurance in order not to pay exorbitant medical fees. Many workers are even forced to reduce their income and are exploited by unscrupulous bosses in order to receive Medicaid. Universal healthcare is a demand shared by workers from all walks of life and with different incomes. The U.S. government should set up a universal healthcare system instead of helping insurance companies and unscrupulous bosses suck our blood!

The U.S. government is deepening the exploitation and division of the working class internally, squeezing our labor to support wars and suppressing other countries externally, destroying their economies and homes, and creating a large number of refugees. These refugees lost their homes and came to the United States to work. However, the U.S. government treats them as criminals and forces them to work illegally and become underground labor. Just as the existence of the 24-hour workday has led to the society accepting long working hours, as long as we allow some workers to be treated as criminals, unscrupulous bosses will use them to bring down the working conditions for everyone.

Now, the New York City government is calling for fast tracking work permit approvals for asylum seekers. Not only does this not solve the fundamental problem of criminalizing immigrants, it also deepens the division between them and other immigrants. At the same time, the government is boosting its efforts to give money to undocumented immigrants while maintaining modern-day slavery systems like the 24-hour workdays. Is it to make unscrupulous bosses more emboldened to lower their wages and destroy their health? In New York City, in addition to asking the U.S. government to stop the war externally, we should also demand that it end its policy of criminalizing immigrants and let all workers have equal rights. This will be of great benefit to us in uniting workers of all identities to improve the working conditions.

This May Day protest, let us carry forward the glorious tradition of the American working class that united workers of all ethnicities and industries to fight for the eight-hour day. Mobilize and unite our communities and people from all walks of life, to demand that the New York City government stop violence and give back our health and lives!

Zishun Ning
Staff, CSWA

弗洛伊德之死引发了全国性的反警察暴力示威。其规模之大，让不少人思考为何示威会在这个节点爆发。要深入了解，就必须看这个制度为何和如何使用暴力。

要知道，这个制度用种种方式每天向我们社区施加暴力——工资盗窃、长时间工作、高房租等。这些经济暴力是慢性的，它持久地蚕食我们的健康和破坏我们的社会关系，让我们成为只想着为生计奔波而出卖劳动力的奴隶。而这个制度所保护的人群——大地产商和无良老板——则在这些经济暴力和剥削中得益。在纽约州，每年有十亿美元的血汗钱从工人手里被偷走。最离谱的例子是家庭护理，她们被迫做24小时工作日，只得13小时工资。而纽约市政府则通过减税等优惠政策鼓励大地产商入侵社区大建豪华高楼，抬高地税和租金，逼迁工人、住客和小商户。警察作为这个制度的一部分来保护有钱人的财产和打压有色族裔，是这个制度性种族歧视和暴力的最直观的体现。

新冠疫情则让这个制度的暴力和种族歧视得到集中体现：很多小商户和住户因失去收入而交不起租金，被迫关门或面临逼迁；必要行业的工人如护理面临感染的风险继续上班，而政府和公司却没有提供足够的防疫用品；有色族裔人士因交不起贵租而被迫聚居，导致疫情期间无法自我隔离，从而使得感染率和死亡率更高。与此同时，大财团和顶尖1%的富豪则获得政府数以千亿的肥厚补贴。美国政府就算如何鼓吹其制度的优越性，也掩盖不了感染和死亡人数远超其他国家这一屈辱的事实。但是，疫情感染和死亡人数只是数字。美国政府劫贫济富的行为虽然是很多人的切身体会，但政府长期以来的慢性暴力已让很多人对此麻木。

而弗洛伊德之死被录了下来，则让人直面这个制度的暴力，从而触发了人们对这个制度的愤恨并上街游行。可以说，弗洛伊德之死是人们对制度性种族歧视和暴力的宣泄窗口。

所以，在我们关注和反对警察暴力和种族歧视时，应该联系到我们每天面对的经济暴力，为了自己和社区的未来而觉醒和组织起来。要真正地解决问题，就要谴责政府勾结大地产商和无良老板，并团结各族裔，要求市长和州长设立援助金保障工人和小商户的生计，全面减租减地税，停止给予大地产商津贴和优惠，并通过【华埠工作组土改方案】来反对逼迁，通过【防工资盗窃法案】来消灭工资盗窃现象。

华人职工会 宁子舜

最近一些工友，對反警察暴力示威不甚了解，他們不明白為什麼這麼多年青人冒着疫情帶來的危險，持續在全美國示威達兩个星期之久，目前還在繼續著。若要明白，必須要了解事情的前因后果。

受害者，大多數是因為輕信政府誤導，不從事或不具備条件进行恰当的隔離和戴口罩。當中黑人，西裔和低收入社群佔比例最多。這了反映政府一向草管人命的态度，只关心如何為大地產商謀利，用種種方法提高地產稅，加租金來奪取勞苦大眾的血汗錢，令紐約低收入階層居住和工作條件比其他城市都差。而華人和其他亞裔人，對白思豪、川普和州長葛謨長久以來已不信任，獨排眾議，勤帶口罩，保護了自己，也保護他人。疫情結果不但令黑裔和西裔的生命損失慘重，也令他们對政府彻底失去了信心。年輕人更是如此。在經濟方面，他們也受害最深。故此，他們不再信任這些政客，行動起來泣喊，將這个社會的不人道，特別是對黑人的歧視、壓迫和剝削，公諸於世。只有這樣，才可以防止疫情過后，警察为了保護房地產利益和压迫低收入社區而使用警察暴力。

這些遊行雖然沒有長遠的目標去改變這个食人的制度，但我们仍應給予支持及持正面態度。華人在美國社會，絕大多數是低下層，時時受到歧視，被剝削，身體被摧殘（君不見，很多華人婦女被迫做24小時工作日，只得12小時工資，導致健康受到影響），也長久以來遭受到警察暴力和种族歧視，但大多數不敢抗拒，死忍。所以這一系列示威遊行運動對我們也很切身。我們多年來的抗爭對象，諸如白思豪和葛謨，已被暴露，政治上已經破產。這个運動對我們反逼迁，反貴租和爭取通過保护社区的【華埠工作小組土改方案】也很有幫助。

華人職工會 林崧